What's new

Who was the last great president of the United States? Well, if you're not on Social Security, you wouldn't be old enough to remember one, says author Aaron David Miller. In his new book, The End of Greatness: Why America Can't Have (and Doesn't Want) Another Great President, Miller concludes that we've had three great ones: George Washington, who launched the republic; Abraham Lincoln, who held it together and ended slavery; and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who got us through the Great Depression and World War II. And as Miller sees it, we will be just as well-off with no more Rushmore-worthy chief executives.

The End of Greatness

Why America Can't Have (And Doesn't Want) Another Great President

by Aaron David Miller

Hardcover, 280 pages | purchase

Purchase Featured Book

TitleThe End of GreatnessSubtitleWhy America Can't Have (And Doesn't Want) Another Great PresidentAuthorAaron David Miller

Your purchase helps support NPR Programming. How?

Amazon

iBooks

Independent Booksellers

Politics & Public Affairs

Nonfiction

More on this book:

NPR reviews, interviews and more

Interview Highlights

On his three choices

For me, greatness means the following: you confront one of the three greatest nation-encumbering crises that the country faced; you extract from that crisis, as you weather it, some sort of transformative change that makes the nation better forever; and, in time, you are appreciated by your own partisans, as well as your adversaries, as a true national hero. And those three, frankly — Washington, Lincoln and FDR — fit the bill.

On "near-great" presidents

I don't like the term near-great, but you've got five — all quite different. You've got Thomas Jefferson, you've got Andrew Jackson, you've got Teddy Roosevelt, you've got Wilson — and that's a contentious choice ... Our 28th president and the only one, frankly, buried in Washington, D.C. And also our only PhD president. And Harry Truman. Those were five consequential presidents who, to some degree, their challenges weren't as severe as the undeniables, their failings and inconsistencies greater than the undeniables. But they defined their era and they met and encountered significant challenges which made the presidency stronger and the country, too.

On Barack Obama, a historic president — but not a great one

My Rx prescription for greatness, basically, is: you have the crisis that allows you to lead the nation — and it has to be nation-encumbering in character; you need the capacity, once the crisis occurs, to fundamentally demonstrate you can succeed; and you need character. That alignment, what I call the three C's of presidential greatness — crisis, character and capacity — has not appeared. Now, when President Obama began his ascent, it was clear — to him, at least — we had a crisis ... But the alignment didn't really work out the way that he wanted to.

He became a deeply polarizing figure — as had Lincoln and FDR and, at the end of his term, Washington. But the problems were quite different. They weren't discrete. They were systemic problems, very difficult to lend themselves to heroic presidential action ... He produced many good things, but the sense of disappointment — the emptiness — between what he promised, what his supporters believed he could do, and the ultimate results were quite large.

On whether we really want another great president, and whether that's even possible

Well, I argue that what prevents greatness is not the absence of an individual who has the capacity to lead, but three or four factors that have fundamentally changed the search and realization of greatness. Number one: FDR's high bar. How do you literally outperform a president who was elected to four terms, who led the United States through its greatest economic calamity and won its last good war? That's number one. Number two: we haven't had and don't want another nation-encumbering crisis which would tame our domestic politics and create a measure of acquiescence in the system so that a great man or woman could actually lead. That's why, I argue, we do not want another great president. And if you want one, buckle your seatbelts, because you're gonna have a nation-encumbering calamity and I'm not certain we could produce the leader to deal with it.

What I'm arguing is that we have to stop expecting the kind of greatness that we witnessed in the past so that we can allow our presidents to be good. And when I say good, I don't mean good in the banal sense. I mean good in the sense that good means effective, good means having moral sensibilities and operating within the parameters of the law. And also good in the sense that you have emotional intelligence. You aren't haunted by demons that create all kinds of internal inconsistencies that can compromise your presidency.