вторник

A Life Examined — And Examined, And Examined In 'Ongoingness'

As a teenager who filled so many journals that my family joked that I spent more time writing than experiencing, I can well understand Manguso's "graphomania," but the word "ever" gives me pause: everything that had ever happened? That, and the fact that her obsessive record-keeping continued well into adulthood, when you would expect the demands of ordinary existence to absorb her time and attention.

In a way, that's precisely what did happen. Diary-keeping, which Manguso says became "an essential component of my daily hygiene," went the way of luxurious baths after the birth of her son. The amnesia of "pregnancy brain" and caring for a little boy "who needed me more than I needed to write the diary" caused her "to inhabit time differently." Her concept of time changed from a series of documentable moments to a constant flow that carries away moments — and individual lives — on its tide, rendering even mortality less troubling.

And when she does write she finds her focus has shifted: "Though I try to log only the first time he does yet another extraordinary thing, the diary is now mostly about my son," she says. In other words — and she acknowledges that "this has all been said before" — the "terrifying and beautiful" experience of watching her son develop has taken her outside herself.

These meditations wouldn't rise above navel-gazing if they didn't somehow shed light on larger aspects of this mortal coil. Like many of the best of this new wave of female essayists grappling with how to live — a group that includes Leslie Jamison, Emily Rapp, Sheila Heti, and Heidi Julavits — Manguso's insights resonate beyond her personal situation. When she has trouble wrapping her head around the ongoingness of marriage, for example, she realizes, "Marriage isn't a fixed experience. It's a continuous one. It changes form but is still always there, a rivulet under a frozen stream. Now, when I feel a break in the continuity of till death do us part, I think to myself, Get back in the river."

Ongoingness is filled with many such lovely observations. As for the compulsion to record everything, she writes, "I came to understand that the forgotten moments are the price of continued participation in life, a force indifferent to time."

The unexamined life? No chance of that with Manguso.

Ever Cheat At Monopoly? So Did Its Creator: He Stole The Idea From A Woman

Monopoly can be pretty addictive once you start playing it, right? Well, for author and journalist Mary Pilon, searching for the game's true origins proved just as consuming. She writes:

"In the process of reporting this story, I hacked off over a foot of hair in one anguished swoop, sold off many of my material possessions, was confronted by law enforcement for falling asleep in public places ... found Monopoly money in my linens when doing laundry, fretted about finances, [and] had nightmares about the various aspects of the story ..."

The result of all that anguish is The Monopolists, a book in which Pilon describes the history of Monopoly. Her book begins with what most people know — or think they know: During the Great Depression, an out-of-work salesman named Charles Darrow was desperate to support his family, so he toiled with a board game in his basement and invented what would become an American icon.

i

Lizzie Magie's Landlord's Game was an argument against the concentration of wealth. Tom Forsyth/Courtesy of Bloomsbury hide caption

itoggle caption Tom Forsyth/Courtesy of Bloomsbury

Lizzie Magie's Landlord's Game was an argument against the concentration of wealth.

Tom Forsyth/Courtesy of Bloomsbury

"I think the Darrow story, from a publicity standpoint, is a beautiful story," Pilon says. "Who doesn't want to believe that they can go into their basement in one of the nation's darkest hours and create something that will change, you know, their own fate and make everybody rich and make you beloved? I mean, I think that's a great story. I can't even tell you how many times in the last few years people say, 'Oh right! You're doing a book about Monopoly! It was invented in the Great Depression, right?' I mean this thing has stuck like nobody's business. And I actually think the true story is more interesting."

The true story of Monopoly begins a few decades before Darrow rolled the dice, with a Washington, D.C., woman named Lizzie Magie. In 1904, Magie patented something called the Landlord's Game, which was, in some great irony, an argument against the concentration of wealth. Her game spread around the country, including to the Quakers of Atlantic City, N.J., who added all their city's street names (Atlantic Avenue, Kentucky Avenue, Park Place). Darrow got his hands on the game through a Quaker friend — and then sold it to Parker Brothers as his own.

The company, like much of America, went with the tale of this down-on-his-luck Depression-era salesman. Pilon says, "I think there's something about us psychologically that just makes us really wired to loving the Darrow story."

Interview Highlights

On Magie's story

i

In 1936, Magie spoke out against the Darrow creation story in the pages of the Washington Evening Star. Anspach archives/Courtesy of Bloomsbury hide caption

itoggle caption Anspach archives/Courtesy of Bloomsbury

In 1936, Magie spoke out against the Darrow creation story in the pages of the Washington Evening Star.

Anspach archives/Courtesy of Bloomsbury

Lizzie Magie was a pretty astonishing woman. She was an outspoken feminist, she had acted, she had done some performing, she had written some poetry and she was a game designer. And at the time that she patented her game, it was before women had the right to vote. And I was very surprised: I thought, you know, female game designers, they're getting more traction today but it's still unusual. And at the time she put her patent application in, fewer than 1 percent of patents in the United States came from women.

On the Monopoly lawsuit that helped resurface Magie's story

In the early 1970s, Ralph Anspach ... was a professor at San Francisco State University. He was living in Berkeley, he had two young boys and he had played Monopoly, of course, and thought that the world needed a more philosophically pleasing version of the game. He felt like Monopoly the game was teaching people things that were bad in real life. And at the time the OPEC oil cartels were really big news; there was a lot of cynicism because of Watergate. So he creates this game called Anti-Monopoly and it isn't long before he hears from Parker Brothers' lawyers, who said, you know, you need to stop making this game. ...

i

In his lawsuit, Ralph Anspach used early, pre-Parker Brothers boards as evidence of Monopoly's controversial origins. Anspach archives/Courtesy of Bloomsbury hide caption

itoggle caption Anspach archives/Courtesy of Bloomsbury

In his lawsuit, Ralph Anspach used early, pre-Parker Brothers boards as evidence of Monopoly's controversial origins.

Anspach archives/Courtesy of Bloomsbury

And that kicks off a legal battle that ends up going on for 10 years. And in the course of that argument — which is, you know, whether Monopoly and Anti-Monopoly could be confused and they rip apart trademark law and copyright law and all these other things as it winds through the court system — Ralph finds out about Lizzie. And he gets all these documents; he starts travelling around the country interviewing the Quakers and some of the early players; he starts finding these pre-Parker Brothers boards; and he becomes a detective trying to unravel the true story of Monopoly. And some of his fate [is] hinging on that story and that the game had this whole life before Parker Brothers entered the picture.

On Anspach's obsession with his Monopoly battle

We know that he ends up victorious and there's like a David versus Goliath aspect to the whole story. And at one point, he was offered a pretty generous settlement, and one of the pieces of the settlement was that he wouldn't be able to talk about the case and he turned it down. I interviewed his sons for the book and one of them had actually ended up becoming a lawyer. And they're both involved with Anti-Monopoly still today and they talk about that as like a very big moment. They remember as kids having this household discussion about this lawsuit, which had just taken over everything. So it was definitely a crusade for him and his family.

The Monopolists

Obsession, Fury, and the Scandal Behind the World's Favorite Board Game

by Mary Pilon

Hardcover, 304 pages | purchase

Purchase Featured Book

TitleThe MonopolistsSubtitleObsession, Fury, and the Scandal Behind the World's Favorite Board GameAuthorMary Pilon

Your purchase helps support NPR Programming. How?

Amazon

Independent Booksellers

Nonfiction

Biography & Memoir

More on this book:

NPR reviews, interviews and more

On why she thinks she obsessed over the Monopoly story

I think that my main business is as a news person. And I think that with ... Wall Street, with politics, with foreign affairs, the job is to get it right. And I remember often, when you tell people you're doing a book about board games, they think you're totally nuts. And that might be warranted. But I feel like if we can't get the story of Monopoly right, like, what hope is there for anything else? And these things that we think are simple are very complicated. And I think that taking that apart was very interesting to me.

On the secret to Monopoly's longevity

Monopoly, specifically, I think now it's so wrapped up in nostalgia for people. I mean one of my favorite debates to have is with game designers who say, you know, the game stinks and here's why. And they bring up valid points, but I feel like that's like critiquing the Model T for not being a good car. It's like, well, it was good for what is was, but it was also created a century ago! And I think that, you know, we can appreciate it for what it was. ...

I think that when you talk to people about Monopoly, they love talking about their memories associated with it. And for me, I'm the same way. I mean, when I think about Monopoly I think of my family playing at the holidays. And so I think now people have projected so much of their own memories and moments onto it that that will keep it going for a long time because it's just this multi-generational thing that everybody can share.

Related NPR Stories

The Two-Way

Not Just Monopoly Money: Some Games Ship With Real Cash In France

Planet Money

Monopoly Game: Rules Made To Be Broken?

Planet Money

Monopoly, A Dangerous Game?

In Houston, Falling Oil Prices Spark Fears Of Job Cuts Beyond Energy

In recent weeks, the price of gasoline has ticked up but regular unleaded still costs about a dollar less than it did a year ago. That's good for consumers, who have more money to spend. But in Houston, one way or another, the paychecks consumers depend on come from the oil business.

The world's three biggest oilfield service firms — Schlumberger, Halliburton and Baker Hughes — have announced a combined 22,000 layoffs in recent months. Those job cuts are worldwide, but many are falling in Houston, where all three companies have headquarters.

Robert Harrold was recently let go by Halliburton's IT department. "My manager's manager came by and told me I was needed in a meeting. And [I] locked my computer up and went over next door to HR. And they said, 'You're being laid off.' Just like that."

This was actually Harrold's second time being laid off by Halliburton in the past 10 years. He says he may turn to security consulting to pay the bills. "The oil services company layoffs don't just affect the folks working out in the oilfields," he says.

Economy

'Kings When It's Good': Oklahoma Braces For Possible Crude Crash

Business

As Oil Prices Tank, Firms Large And Small Feel The Pain

Business

Planning Through Oil Booms Helps Small Producers Weather The Busts

According to a model prepared by economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, a drop of about 50 percent in oil prices is associated with a 1.2 percent drop in Texas employment. If the model proves correct, Texas stands to lose about 140,000 jobs.

"This would be mining jobs, finance, real estate, legal," says Jesse Thompson, a business economist at the Federal Reserve Bank's Houston branch. "This would encompass the entire spectrum of employment impacts as a result of the price declines."

Even with those layoffs, Thompson says, Texas is still poised to eke out a modest gain in jobs this year. Houston will fare worse than the state on average. But it won't do as badly as areas closer to the actual drilling in South and West Texas.

"We have a lot of construction activity going on as a result of the shale gas production boom in the downstream side, in the refining and petrochemicals, that are going to sort of buttress us against these declines in mining employment," Thompson says.

Cheap oil is a boon to refineries. Petrochemical plants rely on cheap natural gas to make their products. All that may be why workers at five nearby facilities were willing to strike, and demonstrate downtown, when negotiations for a new contract broke down. The strike is now in its fifth week.

Still, the pain is already spreading across the region's economy. Office construction is on track to decline. Residential construction is expected to follow suit. At a recent meeting of the Houston Apartment Association, developers expressed fear that the region is already overbuilt.

"They're looking at the number of apartments that are under construction right now that are going to be delivered in the next 12 to 18 months, and they're looking at job growth being reduced, because of the price of oil," says Kirk Tate of Allied-Orion Group, a residential management company.

Houston is no stranger to oil downturns. The price collapse of the 1980s scarred the local economy for years. The mantra throughout the latest boom is that the region has learned its lesson. It's diversified. It's better positioned to withstand another bust. But that's about to be put to the test.

Houston

oil prices

Texas

понедельник

Kerry Tries To Calm Tensions Over Netanyahu Visit

Secretary of State John Kerry, apparently hoping to patch a rift sparked by GOP lawmakers' decision to invite Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address Congress without first consulting the White House, says the administration doesn't want the speech to become a political football.

"The prime minister of Israel is welcome to speak in the United States, obviously. And we have a closer relationship with Israel right now in terms of security than at any time in history," Kerry said on ABC's This Week, adding, "We don't want to see this turned into some great political football."

That's a step back from comments made last week by National Security Advisor Susan Rice, who said Netanyahu's planned address before Congress on Tuesday would be "destructive to the fabric of U.S.-Israeli ties." Netanyahu is also expected to make a speech before the influential American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, in Washington on Monday.

The Israeli leader, who NPR's Jackie Northam says is expected to slam efforts by the Obama administration and five other world powers to reach an agreement with Iran that would limit its nuclear program, also appeared over the weekend to be trying to ratchet down the controversy.

"I would like to take this opportunity to say that I respect U.S. President Barack Obama," Netanyahu said, speaking to reporters at Jerusalem's Western Wall on Saturday. On Sunday, he boarded a plane bound for Washington.

In a separate interview, Kerry said he believed the U.S. needed to give Iran "the benefit of the doubt" as negotiators work toward a long-term nuclear deal, The Associated Press reports.

The AP says: "Kerry stressed that Israel [is] safer as a result of the short-term nuclear pact that world powers and Iran reached in late 2013, and he described that improvement as the 'standard we will apply to any agreement' with the Islamic Republic."

Kerry's remarks came on the same day that South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham told the annual policy conference at AIPAC that he distrusts Iran, saying "they lie, they cheat, they aren't trustworthy, they kill Americans, they would destroy Israel tomorrow if they could."

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Sen. Lindsey Graham

Israel

Ïîïóëÿðíûå ñîîáùåíèÿ

Blog Archive